Decision
The assessments we publish on how well registered providers are meeting our standards.
HTML
MS Excel Spreadsheet, 108 KB
This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
Request an accessible format.
Regulatory judgements and notices are the regulator’s official view of a provider. An A-Z list for providers is also available, which links to each registered social housing provider’s page containing their current and previous judgements.
These appear as separate entries within the regulatory judgements and notices table. They are published where we are investigating a matter and we consider that this investigation might result in a provider (currently judged to be compliant) being reassessed as non-compliant with the economic standards. The purpose of the list is to alert stakeholders to the possibility that the provider may be moving towards non-compliance.
Once we have concluded our investigation, we publish a new narrative regulatory judgement for the provider (or regulatory notice, in the case of a provider which owns fewer than 1,000 social housing units) and remove it from the GUR list.
These judgements show only the governance and viability grading (G and V). They are published when a registered provider (excluding local authorities) which owns and/or manages 1,000 homes or more is meeting our standards, and their grading has not changed since the last published judgement.
These reports provide a more detailed regulatory judgement, setting out the reasons for our assessment. They are published when our view of a registered provider (excluding local authorities) which owns and/or manages 1,000 homes or more has changed, and/or there are important issues or concerns.
Where two or more registered providers come together to form a new merged entity, we issue an interim regulatory judgement which is based on combining assessments of the previous entities against our standards.
Regulatory notices are briefer reports than narrative regulatory judgements. There are 2 types of regulatory notice:
Governance:
| G1 | Compliant | The provider meets our governance requirements |
|---|---|---|
| G2 | Compliant | The provider meets our governance requirements but needs to improve some aspects of its governance arrangements to support continued compliance. |
| G3 | Non-compliant | The provider does not meet our governance requirements. There are issues of serious regulatory concern and in agreement with us the provider is working to improve its position. |
| G4 | Non-compliant | The provider does not meet our governance requirements. There are issues of serious regulatory concern and the provider is subject to regulatory intervention or enforcement action. |
Viability:
| V1 | Compliant | The provider meets our viability requirements and has the financial capacity to deal with a wide range of adverse scenarios. |
|---|---|---|
| V2 | Compliant | The provider meets our viability requirements. It has the financial capacity to deal with a reasonable range of adverse scenarios but needs to manage material risks to ensure continued compliance. |
| V3 | Non-compliant | The provider does not meet our viability requirements. There are issues of serious regulatory concern and, in agreement with us, the provider is working to improve its position. |
| V4 | Non-compliant | The provider does not meet our viability requirements. There are issues of serious regulatory concern and the provider is subject to regulatory intervention or enforcement action. |
Published 18 February 2015
Last updated 7 July 2022 + show all updates
Copyright © 2025 · All Rights Reserved · Institute of Revenues Rating and Valuation
Warning: Undefined array key "User_id" in /home/irrvnet/public_html/forumalert/inc_footer.php on line 4