IRRV Alert February 2 2008

Information Letters

Reports

Written Statement on LABGI scheme payments (4 February 2008)

 

 

 

DEPARTMENT FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Local Government

The Minister for Local Government (Mr John Healey): On 7 January 2008, the

Department published a statement on its website about the Local Authority Business

Growth Incentives scheme:

(http://www.local.communities.gov.uk/finance/labgi/statemtyr3pay.pdf).

 

This indicated that, following further consideration of the new legal challenges that

have been made against the current LABGI scheme and the inherent uncertainty this

causes to the remaining LABGI pot, the Government intended to re-consider all

aspects of the approach used to distribute resources available for Year 3 of the LABGI

scheme.

 

Alongside our re-consideration of the Year 3 scheme, the Government has reconsidered

the payments for Years 1 and 2 of LABGI, which were made on the basis

of a number of Valuation Office Agency rateable value “change codes”. We have

taken the view that there are a number of Valuation Office Agency change codes that

have not previously been used in LABGI calculations, which could contain elements

of business growth. In light of this, and to avoid the additional delay and uncertainty

caused by further legal challenge, the Government proposes to reward authorities on

the basis of a wider set of codes than has so far been the case for Years 1 and 2. I will

set out the details shortly.

 

The Government is still finalising its analysis of options for allocating the resources

available for Year 3 of the scheme. We continue to be convinced of the value of

providing incentives to encourage business growth, a view echoed by the great

majority of the responses to our recent issues paper on the reform of the LABGI

scheme (Building better incentives for local economic growth: reforms to the Local

Authority Business Growth Incentives scheme). We also remain determined to try to

achieve this policy aim for LABGI. However, the inclination of a small number of

authorities to pursue legal action has created greater complexity, uncertainty and

delay. Given this, it will be necessary to retain a portion of the Year 3 funding as a

contingency in this final year of the current scheme. I will make an announcement on

Year 3 methodology and the size of the contingency retained as soon as possible.


IRRV Software

Copyright © 2025 · All Rights Reserved · Institute of Revenues Rating and Valuation
Warning: Undefined array key "User_id" in /home/irrvnet/public_html/forumalert/inc_footer.php on line 4